| 11th
April 2005
On behalf of the Executive Committee of the Federation of Healthcare
Science I would like to present the response from our organisation
to the NHS Pension Review proposals.
The Federation for Healthcare Science (www.fedhcs.net) is an overarching
body representing the interests of more than 40 professional organisations
working in health care. It provides a collective voice for the 50,000
scientists working in health care to the Government, other professions
and members of the public. It works closely with individual professions,
the Chief Scientific Officer and other groups to ensure Healthcare
Scientists help take forward national policy, workforce and professional
issues. A major role of the Federation is to articulate the collective
views of its member organisations on matters that are significant
for the practice of healthcare science in all its many and diverse
forms within the health service. The Federation Executive therefore
welcomes this opportunity to respond to the pension review proposals
as we foresee significant impact on the healthcare science workforce
and consequently on standards of delivery of scientific services
across the NHS.
The Federation advises that:
1. A typical Healthcare Scientist has a long NHS career (a period
of 40 years is not unusual) during which he/she progresses through
a career pathway featuring a significant difference in final over
starting salary. A final salary scheme would therefore be favoured
and provide an extra incentive towards progression throughout the
pathway. Furthermore, an option to retire at 60years of age is considered
reasonable and appropriate after a period of 40 years given that
the changes to working practice in healthcare science field are
constant and highly demanding.
2. NHS Healthcare Science needs a pension scheme that is attractive
(to help recruitment and retention) and so help maintain service
standards - it must therefore be relatively simple to communicate
and understand for those outside the scheme (eg, those considering
a career in Healthcare Science).
3. Healthcare Scientists would look for facility to continue a
NHS pension if working in the private sector (if delivering services
for the NHS) and academia (see StLaR HR Strategy Phase 1 report,
2004).
4. The Healthcare Science workforce is highly specialised with
relatively small numbers of individuals in some key roles. Furthermore,
working as a 60-65 year old in a challenging and dynamic area of
work such as healthcare science will be extremely challenging and
potentially stressful for many individuals. A flexible HCS workforce
is therefore particularly desirable so access to the more flexible
options towards retirement described in the proposals would encourage
individuals to stay within the workforce and benefit local scientific
services.
5. A new career pathway for Healthcare Science in the NHS, due
to be launched shortly by the Department of Health, will provide
opportunities and encourage career development for individuals with
aptitude to progress to the higher levels of responsibility (eg,
as Consultant Healthcare Scientists). Similarly, NHS pension policy
needs to encourage individuals to take on high level leadership
positions (possibly towards the end of a career) that are essential
for successful delivery of healthcare services. Therefore, a final
salary scheme is preferred.
John Day CS
Member of the Executive Committee of the Federation of Healthcare
Science
|